Unilever Stole This Product Idea from a Scientist, 13 Years Later Justice Has Been Served
Waging a legal war against a corporate giant is no easy feat but it is a battle worth fighting for, especially when there is grave injustice involved. Take a look at Professor Ian Shanks, who had fought long and hard for 13 years over a creation that is now widely used but was never credited to him. Finally, justice was served after the United Kingdom’s highest court ordered Unilever to pay him over $2.5 million.
From a Toy and Plastic Film
The 71-year-old invented the electrochemical capillary device in 1982, only using his daughter’s glass slide from a toy microscope, plastic film, and bulldog clips. At the time, the scientist was working under a subsidiary of Unilever and it was the newest LCD technology that prompted the development of the capillary device. Ian was particularly drawn to making something that could measure blood glucose levels, which would later become one of the most crucial inventions for diabetes patients.
He took the invention to his boss, who then said that the company already owned it. Later, Unilever patented the device and started selling the technology to other brands in the 1990s. The technology found its way into many glucose testing devices widespread nowadays, which are mostly used by people with diabetes to monitor their glucose levels.
After more than a decade, the Supreme Court finally awarded the professor what was rightfully his. Ian first came out in 2006, accusing the giant company of making millions from his creation without giving him any credit or monetary compensation. However, he had previously lost the case and had to refile his complaint.
Right to a Fair Share
Thankfully, this time the court unanimously favored with Ian recently, explaining that the invention indeed had given Unilever outstanding benefits, ordering the company to justly compensate its creator.
Judge Lord Kitchin said that the giant company enjoyed significant rewards and tons of money from the creation that the inventor should be entitled to a fair share.
The judge further explained that Unilever received about $30 million from patents, while Ian wasn’t given a single penny. Despite agreeing that the rights to the creation were owned by the mammoth brand, the court said Ian deserves to get his reward.
Unsurprisingly, Unilever was not happy with the decision. A spokesperson argued that they were disappointed because of the overturn of the past judgments and that the scientist was awarded a portion of the license revenue on top of his bonus, salary, and benefits when he was still an employee, working for the company’s R&D department.
The road to winning this battle was not without bumps. In 2007, Ian survived a heart attack and add to that the stress the legal fight was giving him. Despite the stumble, he persisted because he was driven to help other investors. Regarding his compensation, most of it would go to legal expenses, nevertheless, he was still happy that the bout is finally over.
In his argument, the scientist said that Uniliver had violated the Patents Act that was introduced 30 years ago. Under this law, employees who created a product for their companies are entitled to a fair share as long as the company enjoyed an outstanding benefit from the invention.
More in Criminal Attorney
Extremely Vital Things We Need to Do Before Writing Our Will
The morbid truth is that we are all going to die. It’s part of the cycle of life; and as harsh...May 21, 2020
Avoiding a Pricey Divorce: Legal Alternatives You Must Consider
There are many reasons why a couple may wish to separate, and usually the only legal solution to end a marriage...May 21, 2020
Good Guy Turned Bad? Judge Portrayed in American Gangster Faces a Five-Year Probation Because of This SHOCKING Reason
Have you watched the 2007 film American Gangster? There’s a reason it got a series of nods from award-giving bodies: its...May 20, 2020
A Couple Got Arrested After Making THIS Mind-Blowing Claim
Leon Roberts and Jade Muzoka spent their one-week holiday at Cornelia Diamond Golf Resort in Turkey, July 2015. The couple had...May 20, 2020
Reality Star Denise Richards is Coming After Ex-Husband Charlie Sheen Because of This Financial Dispute
It’s been more than a decade since ‘Two and a Half Men‘ actor Charlie Sheen and actress turned reality star Denise Richards parted...May 20, 2020
Tight on Cash? Here’s How You Can Minimize Divorce Attorney Fees
The dissolution of a marriage doesn’t always have to be expensive — well, at least not when you and your partner...May 19, 2020
New Zealand Bans Offshore Exploration for Carbon Neutrality
In exchange for industrialization, modernization, and globalization, we pay the price of environmental destruction. Today, we are experiencing severe climate change,...May 19, 2020
Revealed: Top Ten Law Schools to Go to in 2020
Graduating from Law School is a tremendous feat in itself. Not only does it require you to battle it out with...May 19, 2020
Steps to Take When Your Product Causes Injury to a Consumer
It is always shocking when customers are hurt by a product you sold. However, there is no need to panic. You...May 19, 2020