Unilever Stole This Product Idea from a Scientist, 13 Years Later Justice Has Been Served
Waging a legal war against a corporate giant is no easy feat but it is a battle worth fighting for, especially when there is grave injustice involved. Take a look at Professor Ian Shanks, who had fought long and hard for 13 years over a creation that is now widely used but was never credited to him. Finally, justice was served after the United Kingdom’s highest court ordered Unilever to pay him over $2.5 million.
From a Toy and Plastic Film
The 71-year-old invented the electrochemical capillary device in 1982, only using his daughter’s glass slide from a toy microscope, plastic film, and bulldog clips. At the time, the scientist was working under a subsidiary of Unilever and it was the newest LCD technology that prompted the development of the capillary device. Ian was particularly drawn to making something that could measure blood glucose levels, which would later become one of the most crucial inventions for diabetes patients.
He took the invention to his boss, who then said that the company already owned it. Later, Unilever patented the device and started selling the technology to other brands in the 1990s. The technology found its way into many glucose testing devices widespread nowadays, which are mostly used by people with diabetes to monitor their glucose levels.
After more than a decade, the Supreme Court finally awarded the professor what was rightfully his. Ian first came out in 2006, accusing the giant company of making millions from his creation without giving him any credit or monetary compensation. However, he had previously lost the case and had to refile his complaint.
Right to a Fair Share
Thankfully, this time the court unanimously favored with Ian recently, explaining that the invention indeed had given Unilever outstanding benefits, ordering the company to justly compensate its creator.
Judge Lord Kitchin said that the giant company enjoyed significant rewards and tons of money from the creation that the inventor should be entitled to a fair share.
The judge further explained that Unilever received about $30 million from patents, while Ian wasn’t given a single penny. Despite agreeing that the rights to the creation were owned by the mammoth brand, the court said Ian deserves to get his reward.
Unsurprisingly, Unilever was not happy with the decision. A spokesperson argued that they were disappointed because of the overturn of the past judgments and that the scientist was awarded a portion of the license revenue on top of his bonus, salary, and benefits when he was still an employee, working for the company’s R&D department.
The road to winning this battle was not without bumps. In 2007, Ian survived a heart attack and add to that the stress the legal fight was giving him. Despite the stumble, he persisted because he was driven to help other investors. Regarding his compensation, most of it would go to legal expenses, nevertheless, he was still happy that the bout is finally over.
In his argument, the scientist said that Uniliver had violated the Patents Act that was introduced 30 years ago. Under this law, employees who created a product for their companies are entitled to a fair share as long as the company enjoyed an outstanding benefit from the invention.
More in Criminal Attorney
A Passenger Sued Uber for Causing His Divorce Due to This One Fatal Glitch
Uber is one of the most widely used ride-hailing services today. But that doesn’t mean its operations run smoothly – its...February 17, 2020
Back Pain from a Slip-and-Fall Accident: Symptoms and Treatments
According to the Centers for Disease Control, about 1 out of 5 falls causes a serious injury including back pains. There...February 11, 2020
Law Students Are Using Crazy Tactics to Stay up All Night And It’s Taking a Toll on Their Health
If you are studying law right now, chances are, you are committed to the profession, and rightfully so, since you’re in it...February 11, 2020
This Grandmother Filed a Lawsuit for Suffering Emotional Trauma from Daughter’s Childbirth
Most family members are thrilled to watch their loved ones give birth, but one grandmother was particularly horrified after witnessing a traumatizing birth...February 11, 2020
Thinking of Taking a Friend’s Debt to Court? Here’s What You Need to Know about a Money Claim
Your landlord doesn’t want to return your security deposit or you’ve been scammed by a seller – in both situations, the...February 10, 2020
Good Guy Turned Bad? Judge Portrayed in American Gangster Faces a Five-Year Probation Because of This SHOCKING Reason
Have you watched the 2007 film American Gangster? There’s a reason it got a series of nods from award-giving bodies: its...February 10, 2020
Are You Too Old for Law School, Here’s What You Need to Consider Before Choosing the Major
If you are here, that means you, like many others, chose a career path that has proved to be unsatisfactory. Now...February 10, 2020
‘Money Issues’ Is the Third Leading Cause of Divorce in America—Here’s How Couples Can Avoid Fighting About Financial Matters
After ‘basic incompatibility’ and infidelity’, ‘money issues’ is cited to be one of the leading cause of a couple’s decision to...February 7, 2020
Fitness App Makes Woman Lose Thousands of Dollars in Personal Injury Money!
Sharing information online is the ‘it’ thing for most people today. In fact, social media and its apps have given people...February 7, 2020