Unilever Stole This Product Idea from a Scientist, 13 Years Later Justice Has Been Served
Waging a legal war against a corporate giant is no easy feat but it is a battle worth fighting for, especially when there is grave injustice involved. Take a look at Professor Ian Shanks, who had fought long and hard for 13 years over a creation that is now widely used but was never credited to him. Finally, justice was served after the United Kingdom’s highest court ordered Unilever to pay him over $2.5 million.
From a Toy and Plastic Film
The 71-year-old invented the electrochemical capillary device in 1982, only using his daughter’s glass slide from a toy microscope, plastic film, and bulldog clips. At the time, the scientist was working under a subsidiary of Unilever and it was the newest LCD technology that prompted the development of the capillary device. Ian was particularly drawn to making something that could measure blood glucose levels, which would later become one of the most crucial inventions for diabetes patients.
He took the invention to his boss, who then said that the company already owned it. Later, Unilever patented the device and started selling the technology to other brands in the 1990s. The technology found its way into many glucose testing devices widespread nowadays, which are mostly used by people with diabetes to monitor their glucose levels.
After more than a decade, the Supreme Court finally awarded the professor what was rightfully his. Ian first came out in 2006, accusing the giant company of making millions from his creation without giving him any credit or monetary compensation. However, he had previously lost the case and had to refile his complaint.
Right to a Fair Share
Thankfully, this time the court unanimously favored with Ian recently, explaining that the invention indeed had given Unilever outstanding benefits, ordering the company to justly compensate its creator.
Judge Lord Kitchin said that the giant company enjoyed significant rewards and tons of money from the creation that the inventor should be entitled to a fair share.
The judge further explained that Unilever received about $30 million from patents, while Ian wasn’t given a single penny. Despite agreeing that the rights to the creation were owned by the mammoth brand, the court said Ian deserves to get his reward.
Unsurprisingly, Unilever was not happy with the decision. A spokesperson argued that they were disappointed because of the overturn of the past judgments and that the scientist was awarded a portion of the license revenue on top of his bonus, salary, and benefits when he was still an employee, working for the company’s R&D department.
The road to winning this battle was not without bumps. In 2007, Ian survived a heart attack and add to that the stress the legal fight was giving him. Despite the stumble, he persisted because he was driven to help other investors. Regarding his compensation, most of it would go to legal expenses, nevertheless, he was still happy that the bout is finally over.
In his argument, the scientist said that Uniliver had violated the Patents Act that was introduced 30 years ago. Under this law, employees who created a product for their companies are entitled to a fair share as long as the company enjoyed an outstanding benefit from the invention.
More in Criminal Attorney
Here’s How You Can Secure a Job Right After College
Many people attend college to have the edge over their peers in a super-competitive job market. Still, fresh graduates usually spend time doing...May 3, 2021
Law Students Are Using Crazy Tactics to Stay up All Night And It’s Taking a Toll on Their Health
If you are studying law right now, chances are, you are committed to the profession, and rightfully so, since you’re in it...April 23, 2021
Here’s How You Can Improve Your Credit to Land The Best Mortgage Rates
Let’s cut right to the chase – getting a mortgage is essential to buying your dream home. Unless, of course, you have...April 22, 2021
This Grandmother Filed a Lawsuit for Suffering Emotional Trauma from Daughter’s Childbirth
Most family members are thrilled to watch their loved ones give birth, but one grandmother was particularly horrified after witnessing a traumatizing birth...April 15, 2021
Wendy Williams Makes Up For Dissolving Husband’s Foundation With This Unique Partnership
Television host Wendy Williams has made a name for herself as everyone’s cool TV aunt who’s always in the know when...April 12, 2021
Here’s When You Can Keep the House After a Divorce
Divorce is very difficult as is, but what makes it even more troublesome is controversy over assets, especially the marital home....April 7, 2021
Supreme Court Favored the Class-Action Waivers, Making it Harder For You to Sue Your Employer!
Do you harbor a dispute with the company or employer you’re working for? While it is an employee’s right to file a lawsuit against...April 5, 2021
Are You Making These 3 Common IRA Mistakes?
Most investors think of IRA as a hand-off, long-term investment tool. However, that doesn’t mean one should ignore it completely. Remember...April 4, 2021
Home Warranty VS Homeowners Insurance: Which Is Better?
Okay, be honest – Isn’t buying your own house on your bucket list? Well, it is for many. Everybody dreams of...March 26, 2021