Supreme Court Favored the Class-Action Waivers, Making it Harder For You to Sue Your Employer!
Do you encounter a dispute against the company or employer you’re working for? While it is an employee’s right to file a lawsuit against his or her employer, you might want to think twice though. The Supreme Court’s controversial recent ruling forces employees in class-action waivers, making it difficult for you to sue your boss.
Those abusive employers who overwork their workers or discriminate them may have more room to continue their actions away from the scrutiny of the Supreme Court. This is due to Court upholding the employer’s rights to use class-action waivers in arbitration agreements.
This forces an employee to sign the said agreement, thus, giving up their rights to sue their employers in court for damages or any back pay. Instead, they are forced to take their disputes individually to the arbitrators. This makes it easier for the companies to avoid employee lawsuits.
The Arbitration Agreements are commonly used by employers to restrain any lawsuits or disputes filed which lead to bigger payouts, damages, and loss to the company. This usually happens when workers were backed by labor unions or employee groups.
Together, they challenge their employer’s use for Arbitration Agreements. With the employees claiming the AA violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in which employees were guaranteed to join forces for mutual aid and protection.
The Controversial Ruling
The Supreme Court’s majority decided against the workers, claiming that the said collective bargaining law cannot replace the federal law nor the arbitration process. This also means that class-action waivers brought by employers in an employment contract are deemed legitimate.
Furthermore, he added that while the policy is debatable, the law remains clear and fixed. The Congress instructed that AA should be enforced at all times.
This ruling supported the high court’s former decision that companies can force its employees and consumers into AA’s with class-action waivers and fine prints especially when buying plane tickets or registering for a new cell phone. While the latest ruling sanctioned the use of such waivers in the workplace. Hence, it became a common practice for the last 20 years.
A Heavy Blow to the Workers
The SC’s recent rulings are a heavy blow and have major implications for workers. The filing of class-action lawsuits is one of the most powerful actions for employees to take against their abusive employers. This also serves as their means to secure their back pay, demand a minimum wage, or overtime rights which may have been violated by their employers. Not only that, but it also serves as their protection against bosses who discriminate them in the workplace. The class-action waivers effectively negate the employees’ rights to fight for their labor rights.
Aside from that, it makes it harder for the employees to pursue such lawsuits individually, rather than filing it as part of a bigger, collective group. The labor groups also fear that lawyers may hesitate on backing these individual complaints since the judgments or settlements will be small and may not also be worth their time. The employees also fear their employers may retaliate and make their lives more miserable since they can now only file these lawsuits individually.
The Unfair Deal
Judge Ginsburg stated during the oral arguments that strength comes with numbers. The class action lawsuit can help protect an individual worker’s rights against his or her giant employer. When backed by labor groups and unions, the employee can easily match his employer’s superior strength. She also fears that this may pave way for employers to continue implementing unfair working conditions to their workers such as underpayment, no overtime pays, and layoffs.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, around 25 million workers last year, especially the non-union employees in the private sector, were forced to give their rights to join class-action lawsuits as one of the conditions of employment.
More in Legal Advice
Allegedly, President Trump knew about Payment to Adult Film Star Months Before Denying it!
The ever-spiraling rollercoaster continues. Last week, things took a heated turn for the worst when it was reported that President Trump...May 28, 2018
CBP Under Trump Administration Plans not to Increase Its Capacity to Process Immigrants Stranded at the Border
The U.S. agency in charge of handling the number of migrants attempting to cross by caravan through the California Mexico border...May 28, 2018
Trump’s Lawyer Michael Cohen Had his Phone Calls Monitored by The Feds
With so much controversy surrounding The President and his legal defense team, Americans have watched from the comforts of their living...May 28, 2018
Paralympics Respond to President Trump’s “Tough to Watch” Insensitive Comments
We all know how the current US president can be a bit rude with his words. It has been a subject...May 28, 2018
Three U.S. Citizens Released from North Korean Prison Camps in Preparation for Trump-Kim Summit
In response to the upcoming historic summit that is to take place between North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un and U.S. President...May 28, 2018
President Trump’s Former Physician Claimed He Was Subject of Raid
President Trump’s personal bodyguard, the top lawyer at the Trump Organization, and another man showed up without warning at the office...May 28, 2018
Stormy Daniels Sues President Trump for His “Con Job Tweet”
Aside from the Russian Probe and Cambridge Analytica scandal, President Trump also faces a lawsuit filed by Stormy Daniels, an adult...May 28, 2018
NRA on the Hotspot after Enforcing Gun Ban to Protect Mike Pence
In a recent turn of events, guns were banned during Vice President Mike Pence’s gracing of the National Rifle Association that...May 28, 2018
Trump to Hold Accountable If Republicans Lose the Midterm Elections, Paul Ryan Warns
With Trump’s back to back controversies and probes he faces, there’s no doubt that the Republicans are in a tight spot...May 28, 2018