Connect
To Top

5 Things You Should Know about Family Law — Tips on How to Deal with Them

Understanding the law itself is really tough. So with this in mind, we have thought of pulling off the following things to ditch in terms of family law myths and how you can go about each. Read on and get the right education you need — taken lightly point by point through situational or experiential examples.

In cases when the couple needs to be legally separated, the children will most probably stay with the mother

While it may appear that this is the case, the Court is only guided by what’s best for the child. The use of a shared care arrangement is becoming more frequently used if it is practical and not disruptive for the child. Basically, the general principle is that the Court will firstly look at who has been the primary carer for the children.

Slater and Gordon Lawyers (UK) / Youtube

If the other party has committed adultery, it will affect the financial outcome.

The ‘fault’ cited in the divorce is of no relevance to the finances. The Court has to consider both parties needs irrespective of fault. The only fault that is of relevance in financial matters is if it is directly linked to the financial matters (e.g. gambling, reckless spending).

“I never married my kid’s father, but it carries his last name. That automatically means that he is legally and surely my child’s father”

Often, when a child is welcomed by two married people, everyone automatically presumes that the husband is the child’s father. That is not necessary though if a woman had a child with a man without being married to him. He’s not automatically the kid’s father legally, and he is obliged to acknowledge the child via a DNA test or an affidavit acknowledgment paternity in order to legally be the kid’s father.

Just because the kid’s birth certificate includes its father’s name, it doesn’t mean that he has legal rights when it comes to the child. Unless he seeks legal acknowledgment of it, the mother can neither receive child support, not the child itself can claim an inheritance from the father.

A child having its father’s name doesn’t prove paternity legally, yet, it can be used to help establish legal paternity rights when necessary.

“We are not married but we are living together and so I have rights as a common law wife”

 

This is perhaps one of the biggest myths in family law. According to a poll conducted in 2008 by Parliament, around 51% of people believed in this concept. If you are not married, you do not have automatic financial rights. Any rights are limited to the laws of property and trusts.

In fact, there is some protection for those with children. The courts can make orders to preserve the home in some cases until the children have finished full-time education. The best way to protect your interest is to have joint ownership and/or a cohabitation agreement.

“We are married and therefore I am entitled to half of everything”

While the starting point in cases is equality, the court looks a number of factors when deciding how the assets should be divided. The most decisive factor in most modest cases is the needs of the parties, especially the needs of the children. And in cases where the assets exceed the needs, the court aims for fairness and therefore it may place more weight on other factors such as the length of the marriage, contributions made etc.

“If I transfer assets to a third party, the Court will ignore them”

This is not the case and the Court can either make an order for these to be transferred back to the spouse or ‘add them back in’ to the pot so that any order reflects the fact that the transferor of that asset has already had that money.

The transfers are likely to become common knowledge as both parties will have to provide the other with full disclosure of their financial documentation which includes bank statements and solicitors will pick up on unusual transactions in this documentation. The Court is likely to take a dim view of a party that has tried to conceal assets.

“If my spouse has racked up huge amounts of debt, I am liable for half of this”

wutzkohphoto / Shutterstock

The contractual position is that despite being married the debt is personal and therefore only attaches to the person who has the contract with the creditor (unless you are guarantor). The repayments are therefore the responsibility of the spouse whose name they are in and if there are missed payments it should only affect their credit.

However, there is always a concern if the debts have become unmanageable as a bankrupt spouse will cause problems for you and debts being secured on the other spouses share of the property could cause the home to be at risk.

The matrimonial courts can look beyond the contractual liability and sometimes will consider the debt to be joint when considering the finances if both parties have benefitted from the debt.

More in Criminal Attorney